For future easy access, consider bookmarking this page. https://cal4safetech.org/

Californians for Safe Technology
Californians for Safe Technology
  • Home
  • Wireless Issues
    • Statement of Purpose
    • 5G
    • ADA/EMS
    • Aesthetics
    • Environment
    • Fire Risk
    • Health
    • Privacy & Security
    • Property Values
    • Satellite
  • Tech in Schools & Home
    • 21st Century/E-Rate
    • Tech Health Issues
    • Links to Articles
    • Help for Parents
    • Agency Guidance
    • Documentaries & Videos
    • Wireless Protections
    • Safer Tech Home & Schools
  • Activist Tool Kit
    • What Can I Do?
    • Science for Activists
    • Legal Resources
    • Activist Resources
    • Safety Info & Tools
    • Policies & Ordinances
    • OSHA
  • City/County/Campaigns
    • Alamo
    • Benicia
    • Berkeley
    • Contra Costa County
    • Danville
    • Moraga
    • Oakland
    • Walnut Creek
    • 2023 90+ Federal Bills
    • AB 965 & AB 1095
    • SB 556 & AB 537
    • LA County Title 16 & 22
  • Library
    • Recommended Websites
    • Recommended Videos
    • Recommended Documents
  • Calendar of Events
  • California Success
  • National Success
  • International Success
  • Help our Cause
  • Newsletter
  • Letters & Talking Points
  • Blank
  • More
    • Home
    • Wireless Issues
      • Statement of Purpose
      • 5G
      • ADA/EMS
      • Aesthetics
      • Environment
      • Fire Risk
      • Health
      • Privacy & Security
      • Property Values
      • Satellite
    • Tech in Schools & Home
      • 21st Century/E-Rate
      • Tech Health Issues
      • Links to Articles
      • Help for Parents
      • Agency Guidance
      • Documentaries & Videos
      • Wireless Protections
      • Safer Tech Home & Schools
    • Activist Tool Kit
      • What Can I Do?
      • Science for Activists
      • Legal Resources
      • Activist Resources
      • Safety Info & Tools
      • Policies & Ordinances
      • OSHA
    • City/County/Campaigns
      • Alamo
      • Benicia
      • Berkeley
      • Contra Costa County
      • Danville
      • Moraga
      • Oakland
      • Walnut Creek
      • 2023 90+ Federal Bills
      • AB 965 & AB 1095
      • SB 556 & AB 537
      • LA County Title 16 & 22
    • Library
      • Recommended Websites
      • Recommended Videos
      • Recommended Documents
    • Calendar of Events
    • California Success
    • National Success
    • International Success
    • Help our Cause
    • Newsletter
    • Letters & Talking Points
    • Blank
  • Home
  • Wireless Issues
    • Statement of Purpose
    • 5G
    • ADA/EMS
    • Aesthetics
    • Environment
    • Fire Risk
    • Health
    • Privacy & Security
    • Property Values
    • Satellite
  • Tech in Schools & Home
    • 21st Century/E-Rate
    • Tech Health Issues
    • Links to Articles
    • Help for Parents
    • Agency Guidance
    • Documentaries & Videos
    • Wireless Protections
    • Safer Tech Home & Schools
  • Activist Tool Kit
    • What Can I Do?
    • Science for Activists
    • Legal Resources
    • Activist Resources
    • Safety Info & Tools
    • Policies & Ordinances
    • OSHA
  • City/County/Campaigns
    • Alamo
    • Benicia
    • Berkeley
    • Contra Costa County
    • Danville
    • Moraga
    • Oakland
    • Walnut Creek
    • 2023 90+ Federal Bills
    • AB 965 & AB 1095
    • SB 556 & AB 537
    • LA County Title 16 & 22
  • Library
    • Recommended Websites
    • Recommended Videos
    • Recommended Documents
  • Calendar of Events
  • California Success
  • National Success
  • International Success
  • Help our Cause
  • Newsletter
  • Letters & Talking Points
  • Blank

Welcome

We are proud to be working with Americans for Responsible Technology on these California bills. You can go to their website to learn more about the work we are all doing to try to stop AB 537 & SB 556.  

Click Quick Links Below 

SB 556 & AB 537 Links

Fire Risk

Won't Close the Digital Divide

Remove Local Control

FCC Lawsuit Puts Safety in Question

Op-Eds/Letters to the Editor

League of California Cities & Other Articles


Fire Risk

California Fire Risk

  

In California, fires are a real threat. In recent years, we have had massive fires that have burned down forests, grass covered hills and trees as well as entire neighborhoods leaving destruction, devastation and death. Many of these fires can be traced to electric poles​, which is where site developers like to put their newest 4G & 5G antennas. 

​

In order to accommodate the newest wireless ​infrastructure like 5G​, companies like Verizon are using existing wood electrical poles which require an increase of pole height by 20-25%. They are using these wood poles because they are the cheapest way to build this infrastructure. Adding a 10-ft extension onto 40- or 50-ft pole significantly lengthens the pole while decreasing the force of wind required to topple a pole. When you add more communications equipment to this increased pole height, this "pole loading" adds significantly to pole failure and possibly pole fires! Below are examples of fire issues with poles.


The city of Malibu, which has been deeply impacted by these types of fires, is finding design and engineering flaws in almost every application for cell towers reviewed by their engineers. Most cities let these laws slide through.  Fiber is needed for 5G to operate, and the fiber is not all underground; much of it is strung from utility pole to utility pole with lashing wires, and the lashing wires can come loose due to faulty equipment or improper installation.  


  • The Los Angeles Times has stated that  California utility equipment sparked more than 2,000 fires in over a three year period. 
  • Cal Fire determined 17 of 21 California fires in 2018 were attributed to pole issues. 
  • The deadly Campfire was confirmed to be started by power lines and pole loading by wireless antennas is one of many issues contributing to all of these fires.  
  • 2007 Malibu, California: A Southern California Edison pole (SCE) was structurally overloaded by three wireless carrier facilities owned by AT&T, Verizon and Sprint (now T-Mobile). The pole snapped in the wind and ignited the tall grass. The Malibu Canyon Fire burned over 6 square miles.
  • 2015 Stockton, California: A truck hit the utility pole with 60 kV transmission lines and 12 kV distribution lines in Stockton. The 60 kV line contacted the 12 kV line and instantly increased the voltage on the 12 kV line.  Approximately 5,000 meters owned by Pacific Gas & Electric catastrophically failed. Approximately 80 house fires started as a result.  
  • 2018 Paradise, California: The head of PG&E pled guilty in June 2022 to 84 counts of manslaughter in the deaths of residents who are unable to escape their homes and unable to call for help because cell phones did not work after PG&E cut the power. The deadly Campfire was confirmed to be started by power lines and pole loading. 
  • 2018 Malibu, California: The Woolsey Fire is currently under criminal investigation and therefore the name of the telecommunications carrier involved in the ignition of one of the two key ignition points of the Woolsey Fire is not public knowledge at this time. We know that a telecommunication’s lashing wire was involved. The Woolsey Fire burned three people to death in their cars as they were trying to escape, cost $6 billion, and burned over 400 homes in Malibu – some of which have still not been permitted for rebuilding. 
  • Silverado Fire (2020). This fire was caused by a telecom lashing wire that came loose and forced the evacuation of over 130,000 people.

For more information about fires click here.

Local Control

Removing Local Control

The League of California Cites Opposition Letter

 

Over 50 cities in California have written letters in opposition including-

      

  1. Campbell Opposition SB 556 second   page shows approval.
  2. Cupertino Opposition SB 556
  3. Elk Grove Opposition SB 556
  4. Encinitas Opposition SB 556 page 5
  5. Fairfax Opposition SB 556
  6. Laguna Beach Opposition SB 556
  7. Long Beach Article Opposing SB 556
  8. Los Altos Opposition SB 556
  9. Los Angeles Opposition SB 556
  10. Marin County Opposition SB 556
  11. Newport Beach Opposition SB 556
  12. Palo Alto Opposition SB 556
  13. Palos Verdes Opposition SB 556
  14. Ranchos Palos Verdes Opposition SB 556
  15. Ross Opposition SB 556
  16. Santa Barbara Opposition SB 556
  17. Santa Clarita Opposition SB 556
  18. Sebastopol Opposition SB 556
  19. Solana Beach installing their own   Municipal Fiber
  20. Vacaville Opposition SB 556
  21. Vista Opposition SB 556

 

  • The Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments writes in opposition to AB 537, “We oppose AB 537 because it takes away the authority of local governments to plan their communities, to protect the safety of local residents, and to protect the aesthetics of the community.” They also Oppose SB 556 for similar reasons.


  • Physicians for Safe Technology also Opposes SB 556 and AB 537 and has written a Letter in Opposition to these bills.

Other groups working on this issue include:

  • Americans for Responsible Technology on California Telecom Bills– – https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/talking-points-ca
  • Keep Cell Antennas Away.org- Flyer on AB 537- http://www.keepcellantennasawayfromourelkgrovehomes.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Keep-Cell-Antennas-Away-flyer-on-AB-537-June-24-v3.pdf
  • Environmental Health Trust– https://ehtrust.org/take-action-on-california-telecom-telecom-5g-streamline-bills-2021/
  • Mom’s Across America has written a letter to California Legislators opposing SB 556, SB 378 and AB 537  
  • Communications Workers of America (CWA) District 9 Opposes SB 556  as “it’s a giveaway to big corporations on the backs of workers, residents, and communities.”   The CWA is pushing for more Federal oversight of broadband deployment. In an April 12, 2021 press release they state, “Telecom industry executives said deregulation was necessary for competition and that competition would magically fix everything,” said Brenda Roberts, Vice President of CWA District 7 which covers the Mountain West, Pacific Northwest and Upper Midwest. “It hasn’t, and the public needs watch dogs we can work with to ensure this essential service is there for our communities today and into the future. Without regulation, the goal of universal broadband service is just a nice dream.”

 Organizations Opposing

  1. MISAC Goes on Record Opposing SB 556 - MISAC
  2. Bill of the Week: Senate Bill 556 (Dodd): Small Wireless Facility Siting | Rural Counties (rcrcnet.org)
  3. Update on Key Housing, Land Use, Transportation, and Tribal Relations Bills - California State Association of Counties


This blatant power play by the telecoms undermines the whole purpose of local zoning laws and  the election of local officials who represent the interests of their constituents. It mocks the idea  that the people who live in the community should have some say over how – or even if – every  new technology that comes along must be automatically accepted.  


The industry’s latest marketing blitz for “5G” ignores the fact that 5G doesn’t offer any actual  improvement over our current service. It won’t improve our phone connections, and it’s not  required for national security or first responders. It won’t fix the digital divide or make  driverless cars safer. 


These telecom-sponsored bills are not only unnecessary, they set a dangerous precedent for the  future. Suppose a community doesn’t want facial recognition or personal tracking technology in  its residential neighborhoods? If these bills are passed, communities will have no say about the  matter. It will be up to the telecoms themselves to decide how to integrate their lucrative new  technologies into our lives.  


The California legislature has better and more important things to do than spend taxpayer dollars  helping the wireless industry trample on the rights of Californians.  

FCC Historic Lawsuit

FCC Lawsuit EHT & CHD v. FCC

 

EHT WINS COURT CHALLENGE! 

IN HISTORIC DECISION, FEDERAL COURT ORDERS FCC TO EXPLAIN WHY IT IGNORED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE SHOWING HARM FROM WIRELESS RADIATION 

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judges in favor of environmental health groups and petitioners; finds FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to respond to comments on environmental harm.

You can read more at Environmental Health Trust. 

Op-Eds

Sacramento Bee

Montecito Journal

Montecito Journal

Doug Wood is the founder and director of Americans For Responsible Technology, a national non-profit organization. Larry Ortega is the founder of Community Union Inc, a non-profit based in East Los Angeles, and 35-year veteran in the technology sector. 

Montecito Journal

Montecito Journal

Montecito Journal

  

Telecom Power Grab


Lesley Weinstock represents Safe Technology for Santa Barbara County and Americans for Responsible Technology it.

The Press Democrat

Montecito Journal

California News Times

 

Close to Home: Let cities decide on wireless antennas


Catherine Dodd is Policy Advisor for the California Alliance of Nurses for Health Environments; Lendri Purcell is President of Famlies Advocating for Chemical and Toxics Safety  

California News Times

California News Times

California News Times

 

Fast-tracking 5G will not fix the digital divide 


Jodi Nelson is Co-Founder Californians for Safe Technology 

The Daily Californian

California News Times

The Daily Californian

 

CA lawmakers should withdraw AB 537, SB 556 in favor of more sustainable telecommunications

Marlene Hurd - Alameda County Consumer Affairs Commission 

48 Hills

California News Times

The Daily Californian

  

State Legislature moving to give telecom companies immense power

Bills would block any local control over placement of cell towers and antennas -- and it's passing with almost no opposition.

Article by Tim Redmond who has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills. 

League of California Cities & Other Articles

California League of Cities & BBK Law Oppose

California League of Cities & BBK Law Oppose

California League of Cities & BBK Law Oppose

 California Small Cell Bill to Severely Limit Local Government Control of Street Lights and Traffic Signal Poles - Best Best & Krieger (bbklaw.com) 

The Daily Californian

California League of Cities & BBK Law Oppose

California League of Cities & BBK Law Oppose

 

CA lawmakers should withdraw AB 537, SB 556 in favor of more sustainable telecommunications

Marlene Hurd - Alameda County Consumer Affairs Commission 

AB 537 & SB 556

AB 537 & SB 556 Explained

 

AB 537  wants to  standardize the antenna siting process by eliminating “permits” for safety.  It forces local governments to review and approve antenna applications under stricter shot clocks and if the review is incomplete or found unsafe, the application(s) will be “deemed approved” and cities and counties will need to take the telecom carriers to court to stop construction. This bill overrides the FCC and the 9th Circuit court decision. 


SB 556 will allow Telecom carriers to attach multiple wireless antennas on all streetlights and utility poles in our public rights of way, again without local approval for safety.  The 2018 fires in Malibu were the result of an overloaded pole and resulted in billions in financial costs as well as personal loss and death. Our city/ our county has unique fire safety and zoning needs and these needs should be protected.  We rely on local officials like you to protect our safety, privacy, security, health and property,


These bills won’t improve connectivity, they won’t close the digital divide and they’re not needed for remote learning, working from home or for first responders. These are hoodwinked bills that are meant to seem beneficial, but the real purpose of these bills is to boost telecom profits by removing the time commitment needed for the permitting process. It’s not okay to put the profits of giant telecoms over the rights of their local constituents. 

Sample Letters

These are sample letters written by various activists working with ART. Please fee free to use and personalize.

Ignoring Science for Profit (2) (docx)

Download

The Digital Divide (2) (docx)

Download

The End of Local Control (2) (docx)

Download

The Environment and 5G (1) (docx)

Download

The Telecoms Con (4) (docx)

Download

Where is the fiber optic broadband we paid for_ (2) (docx)

Download

Next Steps to Fighting These Bills

Next Steps for AB 537 & SB 556 August 2021

  •  AB 537 will go before Senate Appropriations on Monday Aug 16.
  • SB 556 will pass Assembly Appropriations on Thurs Aug 19 

Find your Legislators Here.
Thank you for taking this valuable, timely action! 


League of California Cities Letter

Download PDF

Won't Close the Digital Divide

Digital Divide Information

For information about the digital divide go to Americans for Responsible Technology 


The telecom industry wrote SB-556 and AB-537 to fast-track approvals for its powerful new “small cell” antenna installations. The industry is Tired of delays caused by local governments trying to protect the safety and well-being of local residents with local zoning laws. The new antennas are necessary to allow AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and others to enter the highly profitable video streaming business without having to run a physical cable into peoples’ homes or apartments. This has nothing to do with on-line education or improving access to the internet for low income and rural customers. The telecom industry is hoping a new generation of “cord cutters” will switch from their current cable subscriptions to new wireless subscriptions. The sad fact is it’s not worth it for telecoms to install their expensive antennas in underserved communities. People in these minority or economically challenged areas aren’t likely to sign up for expensive monthly subscriptions to Netflix, Hulu, Disney + and other services, which is where the real money for the telecoms lies. It’s a lot more expensive to maintain a wireless connection than a wired connection. 


  

The telecoms are promising that the passage of SB-556 and AB-537 will close the digital divide, but here’s the true story: they’ve been promising to stop “digital redlining” and connect minority and rural communities since at least the 1990s when they began to replace old copper lines with fiber-optic cable. But they never did connect those folks. And these bills contain nothing to make them do it now. The way to close the digital divide is with a superior technology that is faster, more reliable, more affordable, less prone to hacking and is 100% safe for everyone. A lot of the infrastructure is already in place. It’s fiberoptic to and through the premises, or “FTTP.” SB-556 and AB-537 can’t possibly close the digital divide, and anyone who says otherwise is either badly misinformed or deliberately mistaking the facts

 



Copyright © 2023 Californians for Safe Technology - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by GoDaddy

  • Home
  • Statement of Purpose
  • 5G
  • ADA/EMS
  • Aesthetics
  • Environment
  • Fire Risk
  • Health
  • Privacy & Security
  • Property Values
  • 21st Century/E-Rate
  • Tech Health Issues
  • Links to Articles
  • Help for Parents
  • Wireless Protections
  • What Can I Do?
  • Science for Activists
  • Activist Resources
  • Policies & Ordinances
  • Benicia
  • Berkeley
  • Contra Costa County
  • Danville
  • Moraga
  • Oakland
  • Walnut Creek
  • Recommended Websites
  • Recommended Videos
  • Calendar of Events
  • National Success
  • International Success
  • Help our Cause
  • Newsletter